Editor: David E Marlett Th.D.
February 24, 2001Vol II #15
Defending Conservative Christian Values,
in the World, the Nation, the Church and the Home




** Quote to Note ***

"We have gone so far that it almost seems a rule, originally designed to guard against violation of the Constitution, has become an aggressive campaign against religion itself. And isn't that the very thing we set out to guard against -- domination of religion by the state?" --Ronald Reagan





*** Worth Repeating... ***

Excerpts from Official Opinion 2000-9
To: State School Superintendents
From: Georgia Attorney General Thurbert E. Baker

"You have asked for my opinion whether [Georgia law 50-3-4.1] allowing the display of the motto 'In God We Trust' in public school classrooms, is in violation of the Georgia or United States Constitution. You have also asked whether the 'respect for the creator' portion of the character education program authorized by [Georgia Law 20-2-145] and the Georgia Board of Education's curriculum violates either the state or federal constitutional principles of [religious freedom]. It is my opinion that neither [Georgia law 50-3-4.1] nor [Georgia Law 20-2-145] on its face violates [religious freedom] provisions of either the Georgia or the United States Constitution. ...

"Addressing first the issue of whether a poster may be displayed in the classroom with the motto 'In God We Trust,' I note that the motto appears on United States coins and currency and is recognized by federal statute as our national motto. See 36 U.S.C. -- 186. It has been upheld as constitutional in that context. ...

"The more difficult question is whether the character curriculum is constitutional. Official Code of Georgia Section 20-2-145 requires the State Board of Education to develop a 'comprehensive character education program' for levels K-12 focusing on the students' development of 27 character traits including 'respect for the creator.' In August of 1997, shortly after the statute took effect, the State Board of Education developed a policy implementing this statutory requirement. This policy, entitled 'Values and Character Education Implementation Guide,' explains the character trait as follows:

"Respect for the creator: our most basic freedoms and rights are not granted to us from the government but they are intrinsically ours; i.e., the Constitution does not grant Americans the right of freedom of speech, it simply recognizes that each of us is born with that right. This is to say that the founders of the republic recognized a higher authority, a power greater than themselves that endowed every human being with certain unalienable rights that no government or legal document could ever revoke or take away. In the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson names this life force that permeates the universe and from which our unalienable rights stem the 'creator', 'nature's God', and the 'supreme judge of the world'. If we are to respect life, the natural rights of all people and the authority which the founders based their legal opinions on concerning our separation from Great Britain then there must be a respect for that creator from which all our rights flow. This cannot be interpreted as a promotion of religion or even as a promotion of the belief in a personal God, but only as an acknowledgment that the intrinsic worth of every individual derives from no government, person or group of persons, but is something that each of us is born with and which no thing and no one can ever deprive us of.

"Although inclusion of the trait 'respect for the creator' in the character curriculum does not have the historic acceptance accorded to the national motto, it appears not to have a religious effect, especially as interpreted by the State Board's 'Values and Character Education Implementation Guide.' It does not endorse any particular theory of creation, nor does it disparage those who do not hold a belief in creation. ...

"In addition, 'respect for the creator' is not misplaced in ethics or character education. In the study of comparative religion, the 'myths, stories or theories regarding the birth or creation of the universe' are termed 'cosmogony.' Eliade, The Encyclopedia of Religion, Macmillan, 1987, Vol. 4, p. 94. Cosmogonic or creation myths, stories and theories serve as a 'background and context for thinking about' ethics or the 'proper, appropriate and right conduct of a community.' Id. at 99. Thus, although beliefs may differ about creation, the subject itself supports character principles and ethics.

"Based on the above discussion and analysis, it is my official opinion that neither [Georgia law 50-3-4.1] nor [Georgia Law 20-2-145] on its face, is in violation of the principles of [religious freedom] in either the Georgia or the United States Constitution."
[ The Federalist ]

Editor's Comment: Amen!

I can see the problem though. Liberal educators have a big problem with the word "ethics," a word with which Attorney General Baker seems very familiar.





*** Barbara "Baby-Killer" Boxer's Bill ***

Sen. Barbara Boxer last week introduced the "Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001," a bill that would permanently reverse what she describes as a gag rule recently imposed on international family planning groups by President Bush, according to a statement published on Boxer's website. According to Senator Baby-Killer, not paying an NGO to speak is the same as gagging them.

At least two Republicans (RINO's) have so-sponsored the bill, Senators. Olympia Snowe of Maine and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island. The bill claims to have 40 sponsors altogether, but we have not yet seen the entire list. It will be published here when it becomes available to us.

It may not surprise our readers to know that Planned Parenthood who loses millions of tax dollars due to the reinstated Reagan-era Mexico City policy, supports Senator Baby-Killer's bill.
[ TCN ]





*** National Unlicensed Church Conference ***

The National Unlicensed Church Conference will be held this year in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, April 16-17. Several notable speakers will be featured, including Peter Kershaw. Mr. Kershaw is a nationally recognized expert on unlicensing churches, and forming free-churches. Other speakers will share from personal experience about their free-churches and free-ministries.

According to Mr. Kershaw, "No church in America needs to incorporate or become a 501c3. Even the IRS acknowledges that churches are 'automatically tax-exempt and tax-deductible', without ever applying for 501c3 recognition. When churches incorporate and become 501c3, they legally and voluntarily subordinate themselves to the rule of a government that, in more recent years, has shown itself to be quite antagonistic toward the Christian faith. We believe it's high time for churches to quit relying upon the so-called 'privileges and benefits' of the State. The stakes are too high and the dangers too great."

Conference topics will include:

* The Unlicensed Clergy: America's True Founding Fathers
* Is Christ or Caesar Sovereign Over the Church?
* Corporate Limited Liability: A Misguided Idea for Churches
* Dissolving the Corporation
* Terminating the 501c3
* Organizing a Free-Church or a Free-ministry
* Tax-exempt Or Non-taxable?
* Dumping the Tax ID Number
* Banking w/o an EIN or SSN
* Holding Assets
* Are Marriage Licenses Biblical?
* Marriage w/o the State License
* Zoning/Building Code Issues
* Preaching w/o a License

For conference registration information, call Mercy Seat Christian Church at 262-675-2804, or on the internet at: http://www.mercyseat.net

Mr. Kershaw is available for radio and television interviews, and for newspaper and periodical articles.





*** Fighting sweatshops one Nike sneaker at a time... ***

Nike now lets you personalize your shoes by submitting a word or phrase which they will stitch onto your shoes, under the swoosh. So Jonah Peretti filled out the form and sent them $50 to stitch "sweatshop" onto his shoes. Here's the responses he got... fun and games with Nike...

- - - - - - -

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" < nikeid_personalize@nike.com> mailto:nikeid_personalize@nike.com> 
To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" < peretti@media.mit.edu>  
Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled for one or more of the following reasons:

1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark or other intellectual property.

2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we do not have the legal right to use.

3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want any personalization?

4) Your Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and besides, your mother would slap us.

If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com

  

Thank you,
NIKE iD

- - - - - - - -

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" 
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"   
Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Greetings,

My order was canceled but my personal NIKE iD does not violate any of the criteria outlined in your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes was the word "sweatshop."

Sweatshop is not:

1) another's party's trademark,
2) the name of an athlete,
3) blank, or
4) profanity.

I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor of the children that made my shoes. Could you please ship them to me immediately.

Thanks and Happy New Year,
Jonah Peretti

- - - - -

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"   
To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" < peretti@media.mit.edu >  
Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled because the iD you have chosen contains, as stated in the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang". If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com

Thank you,
NIKE iD

- - - - -

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" < peretti@media.mit.edu>  
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" 
 
Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes. Although I commend you for your prompt customer service, I disagree with the claim that my personal iD was inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's Dictionary, I discovered that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not slang. The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates from 1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your first email.

Your web site advertises that the NIKE iD program is "about freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are." I share Nike's love of freedom and personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build my own shoes, and my personal iD was offered as a small token of appreciation for the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I hope that you will value my freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to reject my order.

Thank you,
Jonah Peretti

- - - - - -

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" to:nikeid_personalize@nike.com> 
To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" < peretti@media.mit.edu>  
Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the NIKE iD web site that "Nike reserves the right to cancel any personal iD up to 24 hours after it has been submitted". In addition, it further explains: "While we honor most personal iDs, we cannot honor every one. Some may be (or contain) other's trademarks, or the names of certain professional sports teams, athletes or celebrities that Nike does not have the right to use. Others may contain material that we consider inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our products. Unfortunately, at times this obliges us to decline personal iDs that may otherwise seem unobjectionable.

In any event, we will let you know if we decline your personal iD, and we will offer you the chance to submit another." With these rules in mind, we cannot accept your order as submitted. If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com

 < http://www.nike.com/>

Thank you,
NIKE iD

- - - - - -

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" < peretti@media.mit.edu  
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" nikeid_personalize@nike.com  Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for the time and energy you have spent on my request. I have decided to order the shoes with a different iD, but I would like to make one small request. Could you please send me a color snapshot of the ten-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes?

Thanks,
Jonah Peretti

-- no response --

###end

As one forwarder writes:

" ... this will now go round the world much farther and faster than any of the adverts they paid Michael Jordan more than the entire wage packet of all their sweatshop workers in the world to do..." I normally avoid making a plea to pass on these things, but this time I say:

JUST DO IT

><

"Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy." Psalms 82:3

"Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked." Psalms 82:4

+++




The Conservative Christian Newsletter homepage is at http://www.wilderness-cry.net/tccn
Subscriptions are free. Donations are graciously accepted.

To be removed from this mailing list you can unsubscribe through the homepage
or send your request to Unsub-tccn@wilderness-cry.net

If this newsletter was forwarded to you and you would like a free subscription simply send an e-mail to subscribe-tccn@wilderness-cry.net