CHAPTER FIVE
Further Examination of the Epistles
PASSING over for the present the Apostle Paul's presentation of the
sevenfold unity of Christianity in Ephesians 4, and his identification
of the Body and the Bride in chapter 5, which we shall discuss later, we
turn now to others of the prison epistles to see if we can find the slightest
intimation of a new revelation given after Paul reached Rome. Unquestionably,
Philippians was written during the Roman imprisonment. But we search
its four precious chapters in vain for the least suggestion that he has
received anything new to unfold. In chapter 1, where he presents
Christ as the believer's life, he shows how thoroughly the evangelistic
spirit had taken possession of him, so that even in his prison-cell he
was rejoicing that Christ was being preached whether in pretence or in
truth, and his own desire is that this same Christ may ever be magnified
in his body, whether in life or in ,death. He urges the saints to
stand fast in one spirit contending for the very faith which he had already
made known to them. There is not a hint that he has now something
new to reveal; that is, that the old dispensation to which they had hitherto
belonged had come to a close, and that a new one had begun. In chapter
2 he dwells on Christ as our Example, and shows how he himself and Timothy
and Epaphroditus during the years had sought to follow in Christ's steps,
and this is still before his soul. In the third chapter he recounts
his past experiences and self-confidence in the old days before be was
saved, and then shows how the change was brought about by a sight of the
risen Christ. From that moment on, he counted all things as loss
for the One who had won his heart, and he was pressing on toward the mark
for the prize of the calling of God on high in Christ Jesus. He calls
upon them whom he designates as "perfect" to be thus minded. "Perfect"
here means "mature," or we might even say well-rounded, or well-balanced.
Nothing is needed to give them this perfection in addition to what they
already had. Surely, if anywhere, this was the place to show them
that hitherto they were but babes, and had only received an initial revelation,
but that now he had something for them of an altogether new character which
would perfect them in Christ. But there is no word of any such added
truth. Nor yet in the last chapter where he exhorts to unity and
peace among themselves. May we not say that Paul is singularly remiss
in not sharing with his old converts at Philippi the new revelation he
had received, if such a thing were really true?
But it was not true:-all the reasoning of the ultra-dispensationalists
to the contrary notwithstanding;-for when we turn over to Colossians we
find him once more reiterating the same truths he had proclaimed for a
generation. He shows that two ministries had been committed to him
from the first. He had been made a minister of the Gospel.
That Gospel has been preached in all the creation which is under heaven.
He had also been made a minister of "the mystery which hath been hidden
from ages and generations, but now," he says, "is made manifest to His
saints: to whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of
this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in (or, among) you, the
hope of glory: whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man
in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus: whereunto
I also labor, striving according to His working, which worketh in me mightily"
(Col. 1: 26-29).
Let it be carefully observed that he is here covering his entire ministry.
He had no such opportunity to preach to multitudes while he was in his
Roman, or as some think, his Caesarean prison at the time he wrote this
epistle. But he tells us what had characterized his ministry throughout
the years. Other saints there were whom he had not met personally,
as well as those at Colosse. He thinks of the Laodicean believers,
and he longs that they all may be brought into the knowledge of this mystery.
But it is not something new. It is that which has ever characterized
his teaching.
The Epistle of Titus is not of course a prison epistle at all, but
it was written later than any of those that are so designated, excepting
Second Timothy. In this letter Paul instructs the younger preacher,
Titus, as to the divine order for local churches, the work of a true pastor,
and the testimony committed to the servants of God. Surely here,
if anywhere, we should expect him to put before Titus the fact that the
"transitional period" has now come to an end and Titus must ring the changes
as the ultra-dispensationalists do to-day, on "body truth," "closed doors,"
"Jewish Gospels," "Kingdom Age," etc., etc., ad nauseam. But, no;
none of these terms so frequently used and played upon until one is wearied,
are suggested to Titus. He is simply to go on preaching and teaching
the very same things that have been taught during his earlier association
with the Apostle Paul.
The brief letter to Philemon we may pass over, as we would hardly expect
to find anything doctrinal in it; and yet even here if Paul's heart were
throbbing with the joy of some absolutely new opening up of truth, we would
almost wonder how be could help saying a word about it, at least to his
friend Philemon.
Hebrews was undoubtedly written very shortly before the apostle's martyrdom,
granting that it is from the pen of Paul. That this is so, I have
tried to make clear in my book on the Epistle to the Hebrews, and I shall
not attempt to go into it now. But in any case, it was undoubtedly
written very shortly before the destruction of Jerusalem, and here if anywhere,
one might expect these Hebrew believers to be told that the "kingdom age"
is now over, "the transition period" has now been finished, and it is for
them to accept the new revelation of "body truth." But we search in vain
for anything of the kind. It is simply a normal presentation of the
precious things of Christ, showing how completely Old Testament types have
had their fulfilment in Him and His finished work, and that all who believe
now come under the blessings of the new covenant.
Probably later than Hebrews is the second letter to Timothy.
It was penned during Paul's second imprisonment, very shortly before his
death. As this occurred in A. D. 66 or 67, we may see how far along
we have come and still no mention of any new revelation. So far as
the truth that is dealt with is concerned, Second Timothy might have been
written any time before the first imprisonment. It is in perfect
harmony with all the apostle's previous ministry.
But now there are other Epistles to be considered. We have already
seen that Paul makes no claim to being the sole depository of the revelation
of the mystery. He says it was made known to Christ's holy apostles
and prophets by the Spirit, and so we turn to consider the writings of
other apostles and prophets asking, "Have we in them any intimation of
a new revelation after Paul went to Rome?"
We may dismiss the Epistle of James as not touching on this question.
It is addressed definitely to the twelve tribes scattered abroad, and is
God's last word, as it were, to those of Israel who were still more or
less linked in spirit to the synagogue. Bullingerites generally tell
us that James was the first epistle to be written but this is absurd on
the face of it. It is quite evident that James is a corrective epistle.
It must have been written after the doctrine of justification by faith,
as proclaimed by Paul, had been widely preached, for James writes to check
those who were abusing that doctrine and using it as an occasion for the
flesh. No one can read chapter 2 thoughtfully without seeing that
it is based upon, and has in view throughout, Paul's teaching in Romans
4. James does not contradict Paul in the slightest degree, but he does
show that there is another justification than that of which Paul speaks.
The great apostle to the Gentiles deals particularly with justification
by faith before God. James, the apostle to the twelve tribes, emphasizes
justification by works before men.
First Peter was probably written before Paul's second imprisonment.
Second Peter was certainly written afterwards, and all of Paul's letters
were already in circulation when this epistle was penned. Note Peter's
own words: "And account that the long-suffering of our Lord is salvation;
even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto
him hath written unto you; as also in all his epistles, speaking in them
of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which
they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures,
unto their own destruction" (2 Pet. 3: 15, 16). It is impossible
to understand these verses excepting in the light of the fact that all
the Epistles of Paul were already in circulation. Does Peter then
tell us that a new dispensation had come in, and that the middle wall between
Jew and Gentile having now for the first time been broken down and the
one Body formed, the believers to whom he writes, who were of Jewish extraction,
are to recognize this new revelation? Not at all. Peter has
never heard of any such thing. He puts Paul's writings on the same
plane as the other Scriptures, but warns against the danger of misunderstanding,
and so wresting them.
Long years after all the other apostles had gone home to heaven, we
find the aged John still preserved in life and caring for the churches
of God. According to apparently reliable Church History, he made
his home in Ephesus, and moved about in old age among the other churches
mentioned in the first three chapters of the Book of the Revelation, those
churches which the Bullingerites declare never existed in the past but
are still to arise as Jewish Assemblies in the Great Tribulation!
Could anything be much more grotesque?
John's Epistles were written, according to the very best authority
we have, some time in the last decade of the first century of the Christian
era. Weigh this well. Paul had been in heaven for nearly thirty
years. John was an inspired apostle, and surely would know, if any
one did, of the new revelation and its importance. But we search
his letters in vain for the least reference to anything of the kind.
In fact, we find the very opposite. False teaching had come in, and
he writes to garrison the hearts of the saints against it. In order
to do this, he refers them back to that which was from the beginning, namely,
to the teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and His apostles, as a
careful reading of his first Epistle makes abundantly clear. There
is not the slightest basis for the thought that a fuller unfolding of truth
had been vouchsafed to Paul and others about thirty years after Christ's
ascension. It is the message that they had heard from the beginning
which he again commends to them.
Let us imagine the late Dr. Bullinger, or some of his lesser satellites,
living, not in the twentieth century, but in the closing days of the first
century of the Christian era. Filled with their ideas of a new revelation
given to Paul in prison, can you by any stretch of the imagination think
of them writing epistles or treatises in which no reference whatever is
made to the supposedly new doctrines? The fact of the matter is that
these men today can scarcely open their mouths without speaking of these
things. No matter what text they begin to expound, they almost invariably
wind up with something about their system of rightly dividing the Word
of Truth, and the importance of making the fine distinctions which they
imagine they see in the Word. Yet inspired men like Peter and John,
and without particularly going into it, we may add Jude, can expound and
apply the Truth of God in the fullest possible way without any reference
to anything of the kind. What is the only legitimate conclusion?
It is that this whole ultra-dispensational system is an idle dream unsupported
by the testimony of the inspired writings.
Error is never consistent. It always over-emphasizes some point
generally unimportant and fails to recognize other things of great importance.
Heresy is simply a school of opinion in which something is particularly
pressed out of proportion to its logical place. Who would dare to
say that this system we have been attempting to refute is not therefore
heretical? Mark, I do not mean to class it with what Peter calls
"damnable heresies," but it is certainly schismatic, and its votaries constitute
a special school of opinion within the professed Church of God, a school
that attaches great importance to something which after all is not evident
to the vast majority of devoted and godly believers. That the effect
of this can only be division and harmful, is not only self-evident, but
has been abundantly manifest in many places. The Holy Spirit says,
"A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject;
knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned
of himself" (Titus 3: 10, 11). This is as certainly the Word of God
as anything else revealed in the Scripture of Truth.
Index | Next Chapter